In California, for instance, a poll co-sponsored by The Times found that 44% of voters support building more reactors in the state, compared with 37% opposed and 19% undecided. “I would feel that I was letting other people down if I ever moved,” she said.Īs global warming brings deadlier and more destructive heat waves, wildfires, droughts and other weather extremes, public opinion has shifted somewhat in nuclear power’s favor. When I asked her why she hadn’t moved away, she told me she loves the place too much to leave - the people, the weather, the ocean, her backyard garden. Seeley has now spent four decades fighting to free her community from atomic energy. The two reactors began commercial operations in May 1985 and March 1986. So she moved to San Luis Obispo County, thinking it would be a safe place to raise her family.įederal officials had other ideas. But after learning that certain seismic safety features - added in response to a newly discovered earthquake fault - had been installed backward at Diablo Canyon, she figured federal officials would never allow the facility to open. She’d heard about the nuclear plant under construction, and the raucous protests. Seeley moved to the area from Minnesota with her husband and three children in the early 1980s. Jones mentioned that he’d worked closely with Linda Seeley, vice president of anti-nuclear group San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, and he considered her a friend despite their differences of opinion. With coal, oil and natural gas, the risk is runaway climate change that threatens human civilization and countless animal and plant species.Īnd with nuclear, the risk is radioactivity. ![]() With solar and wind, the risk is blackouts - at least in the absence of a lot more batteries than we’ve got today.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |